Bernd Helmle wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:47:04 -0500, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>> well after the latest fixes in CVS they actually work(at least i use
>>> them regulary) - and I think it is Bernds intention to take over
>>> maintainance and actively fix them ...
> 
> Thats exactly my intention. I'm currently about to clean up the code and
> to make them to use at least strict/warning. What we need for this kind
> of tools is a reliable framework and regression tests, so that broken 
> functionality could be detected. I have some ideas already...

I'm also interested to help improve these tools, and expect to have some
for it as well. I agree with the approach of getting "use
strict/warnings" to work, as well as have some automated tests for the
tools.

Should I just keep sending patches to this list for nwo, or would direct
access to an SCM system be preferable?

   Mark
   (a.k.a markstos at cpan.org)