Mon Dec 4 09:36:42 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Version 1.2.2 soon
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Improving Slony performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:48 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > > Applied to -HEAD. Should I backpatch to 1.2? > > I'd say "definitely." Ok, applied. Regards, -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20061204/e2850065/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Version 1.2.2 soon
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Improving Slony performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list